(UNIVERSAL) OFC 69: Execution (Official Card)

Chase, good fight with vet, but I heard that you used Tito. I'm not trying to get on your back, just pointing this out so it doesn't happen again:

http://www.ofc-league.com/fighter-acquisition-f4/universal-fighter-ratings-t16055.htm

Lyoto Machida – 78
Anderson Silva – 78
Shogun Rua – 77
Rampage Jackson – 76
Vitor Belfort – 76
Dan Henderson – 76
Thiago Silva – 76
Rashad Evans – 76
Rich Franklin – 75
Wanderlei Silva – 74
Michael Bisping – 74
Tito Ortiz – 74
Forrest Griffin – 73
Brandon Vera – 73
Ryan Bader – 73
Luiz Cane – 73
Steve Cantwell – 73
Matt Hamill – 73
Jon Jones – 72
Mark Coleman – 72
Wilson Gouveia – 72
Chuck Liddell – 72
Krzysztof Soszynski – 71
Jason Brilz – 71
Keith Jardine – 70
Stephan Bonnar – 69

http://www.ofc-league.com/rules-and-code-of-conduct-f41/league-competition-rules-t15527.htm

"- The challenged champion will use their fighter and the champion challenging will choose someone of equal or less rating. (fighter ratings can be found in the fighter acquisition forum)"

Tito has a higher rating than Hamill. Just letting you know so it doesn't happen again. Not trying to threaten you in any way, or offend you in any way. VET was a true gentleman in letting you fight with him though.

Chasethe1 wrote:

once again, and his will be my last starement.. yiu owned me, but everyone knows why they try that rnc, if they really thught it would finish the fight, then they wouldnt punch first and lose stamina, its a tactic to keep the figh on the ground, im not mad about it, nothin wrong with, hell, if i am eer in that situation ill do the same thing (and also shine as hard as possible) but its not gonna work, but it will keep them on the ground, which will be the whole reason for me to do it. im just pointing that out.

and i wouldnt have said anything about it, but i saw you posted that you did it to end the fight (punch out some stamina before trying a sub) if you would have put "went for the rnc so that he couldnt stand" i wouldnt have said a thing, just pointing out the truth.. (and thats not cheating at all, just a smart tactic)

ok well i was just trying to be real with you but you kept making it sound like i only did it to keep you down which aint true i dnt play like that you was rokd and i had your back so yea ima try subb you it dont matter wat position im in if i rock you ima try subb while your rokd and im not trying to turn this into a fued but that comment kinda pissed me off cuz its based on your opinion so moving forward gf to you and good luck with your mw run im not gna repost so if you do and i dnt respond you no

STAN wrote:

Chase, good fight with vet, but I heard that you used Tito. I'm not trying to get on your back, just pointing this out so it doesn't happen again:

http://www.ofc-league.com/fighter-acquisition-f4/universal-fighter-ratings-t16055.htm

Lyoto Machida – 78
Anderson Silva – 78
Shogun Rua – 77
Rampage Jackson – 76
Vitor Belfort – 76
Dan Henderson – 76
Thiago Silva – 76
Rashad Evans – 76
Rich Franklin – 75
Wanderlei Silva – 74
Michael Bisping – 74
Tito Ortiz – 74
Forrest Griffin – 73
Brandon Vera – 73
Ryan Bader – 73
Luiz Cane – 73
Steve Cantwell – 73
Matt Hamill – 73
Jon Jones – 72
Mark Coleman – 72
Wilson Gouveia – 72
Chuck Liddell – 72
Krzysztof Soszynski – 71
Jason Brilz – 71
Keith Jardine – 70
Stephan Bonnar – 69

http://www.ofc-league.com/rules-and-code-of-conduct-f41/league-competition-rules-t15527.htm

"- The challenged champion will use their fighter and the champion challenging will choose someone of equal or less rating. (fighter ratings can be found in the fighter acquisition forum)"

Tito has a higher rating than Hamill. Just letting you know so it doesn't happen again. Not trying to threaten you in any way, or offend you in any way. VET was a true gentleman in letting you fight with him though.

If you add the stats up etc. Hamill is better then Ortiz, and Rizzo also said it was okay.

DevinSkiLLzriLL wrote:

If you add the stats up etc. Hamill is better then Ortiz, and Rizzo also said it was okay.

I went over that list when I was putting up for the 2nd time. I added all the stats including str/spd/card, and divided it by 19... Overall of Tito is better than Hamill, 100%. And again, I was just pointing it out.

Vet let him fight with Tito anyways.

STAN wrote:

DevinSkiLLzriLL wrote:

If you add the stats up etc. Hamill is better then Ortiz, and Rizzo also said it was okay.

I went over that list when I was putting up for the 2nd time. I added all the stats including str/spd/card, and divided it by 19... Overall of Tito is better than Hamill, 100%. And again, I was just pointing it out.

Vet let him fight with Tito anyways.

But Rizzo said it was okay.... And when I fight Vet next card, I think I might use Ortiz.

DevinSkiLLzriLL wrote:

STAN wrote:

DevinSkiLLzriLL wrote:

If you add the stats up etc. Hamill is better then Ortiz, and Rizzo also said it was okay.

I went over that list when I was putting up for the 2nd time. I added all the stats including str/spd/card, and divided it by 19... Overall of Tito is better than Hamill, 100%. And again, I was just pointing it out.

Vet let him fight with Tito anyways.

But Rizzo said it was okay.... And when I fight Vet next card, I think I might use Ortiz.

Rizzo must have made a mistake. PM me about it. Let's not make this a public matter, and I will explain it to you in a PM. Sorry, won't reply in this thread any more.

DevinSkiLLzriLL wrote:

STAN wrote:

DevinSkiLLzriLL wrote:

If you add the stats up etc. Hamill is better then Ortiz, and Rizzo also said it was okay.

I went over that list when I was putting up for the 2nd time. I added all the stats including str/spd/card, and divided it by 19... Overall of Tito is better than Hamill, 100%. And again, I was just pointing it out.

Vet let him fight with Tito anyways.

But Rizzo said it was okay.... And when I fight Vet next card, I think I might use Ortiz.

well if infact tito is btr stat wise id prefer he not be used because i knew it was close but but the rules clearly say the same or lower so they shouldnt be bent 4 no 1

w

Stan, I see you won another OFC match.

Where is the card I can't find it?

http://www.ofc-league.com/ofc-championship-league-ofc-f11/ufc-vet-t16456.htm

chasethe1 wrote:

honestly.. i really dont care what that thing says bc if it does say that tito has better stats than hammill, then thats just onee more mistake THQ made.. look at the numbers.. go add them up yourself and tell me if tito is rated higher then hammill.. and if someone comes up with tito has better overall stats then hammill, then you are fucking retarded and need to go back to 3rd grade to learn simple math (adding and division)

ok, so just as i have posted before Tito is lower than hammill, any idiot with a caculator can see that.. rizzo did not bend the rules for me.. any mentally challenged person with a 3rd grade lol of school can see that.. The rules did not get bent, tito is lower than hammill, and for everyone will do basic math.. these are their numbers (once again) andi will break down th math for you all in just a sec..

Matt hammill
total-74.8421
attributes avg-78.3333
skills avg- 74.1875

tito ortiz
total- 73.7895
attributes avg- 76
skills avg- 73.3125

ERROR818 wrote:

Stan, I see you won another OFC match.

Where is the card I can't find it?

Huh?

I won my fight against shadownero this card...

-LW: Gray Maynard (STAN 5-1) defeats Jens Pulver (shadownero 4-8 ) via Submission at 3:38 in Round 1

won against shadownero 5-1
lost to memphis 4-1
won against LoveHer- 4-0
won against ERROR818
won against Shadow_Tiiger
won against jsk1001

Your problem?

Tito Overall: 73.7368421
Hamill Overall: 73.2641579

Overalls are not calculated as Attributes/Skills separately.

You add everything together, attributes/skills, and then divide by 19. You don't add attributes then divide by 3, and then skills, divide by 16, then take overall of the 2 overalls lol

You take everything together.

This is how every other fighter was calculated by THQ so I don't think we should change their system lol.

Those stats aren't accurate. I've just checked IN THE GAME. After the stat changes THQ did, Tito is a 73 and Hamill is a 74.

So Chase is right.

82+70+83+78+71+72+72+80+75+80+72+74+75+80+82+70+74+59+73=1421

1421/19= 74.789474

those are hammills numbers.. anyone disagree?

Why do so many people always insist on a problem. It seems like a CHB thing.

I was only asking because I thought you lost your belt on this card but I was wrong.

I'm sure you'll have the next crack at the title with a win over Pulver

I was wrong.

After the patch update:
Hamill: 74.8421053
Ortiz: 73.7368421

I humbly apologize in front of Chase and Devin. You are completely good to go using Ortiz against Hamill.

My apologies.

Pic of it:

Yep, you are right Sic. My fault guys.

And I was respectfully disagreeing, now I respectfully agree =).

not a problem.. Apology Accepted.. but ppl saying rizzo bent the rules for me pisses me off.. Expecially when you have been explained the truth over and over and chose not to believe it. i believe thats called ignorance. but one more time, this is how i did my math everyone

Matt hammill
total-74.8421 (all divided by 19)
attributes avg-78.3333 (att divided by 3)
skills avg- 74.1875 (skills divided by 16)

tito ortiz
total- 73.7895 (all divided by 19)
attributes avg- 76 (att divided by 3)
skills avg- 73.3125 (skills divided by 16)

Im done here

Chasethe1 wrote:

not a problem.. Apology Accepted.. but ppl saying rizzo bent the rules for me pisses me off.. Expecially when you have been explained the truth over and over and chose not to believe it. i believe thats called ignorance. but one more time, this is how i did my math everyone

Matt hammill
total-74.8421 (all divided by 19)
attributes avg-78.3333 (att divided by 3)
skills avg- 74.1875 (skills divided by 16)

tito ortiz
total- 73.7895 (all divided by 19)
attributes avg- 76 (att divided by 3)
skills avg- 73.3125 (skills divided by 16)

Im done here

Yep, all fair my friend. Sorry again. Rizzo didn't bend any rules.

thats 1 page of nothing ! looool .. good fights you 2 ! unlucky chase it happens bro that back suplex is a fuckin bitch and unfair .. good fights though

I never said I will use Ortiz lol, I said it was a thought anyway.

this little fight is cute and all but am i going too get frank mir for next card or what???

No.

Let's get the new card up I wanna FIGHT!

i want an admin too tell me yes or no not some chump

Your in the wrong area kid, you don't deserve a response.